Dress, Gender, Power

Dress, Gender, Power

Dress problems
I grew up in a small town in rural New Zealand and in my sixteenth year I met a feminist for the first time. She came to our school from the city and she brought with her a rage and a consciousness that both intrigued and informed me. At the city fair that year, I visited the stall where a group of women were giving out pamphlets under a banner announcing International Women’s Year; the group was surrounded by slogans such as “a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle”. Although not quite understanding this, I observed how much these women rattled the men. Here was power!

These events were taking place at a time in my life when the narrowing expectations of my life as a woman were beginning to register. I was becoming aware of gender distinctions and learning that the trappings of the female gender are called femininity, and that they are indeed a trap. I was also becoming increasingly conscious of myself as an object of a sexually appraising male gaze, simply because I was a woman, and young. I tried to erase gender from interactions with males, since I felt myself to be a person first and female second, but this left me nowhere, feeling invisible and outside.

I looked at my options: nice girl married in church/quarter acre lawn/husband/dishes/–groomed, plucked, shaved, made-up, good. Even if I had been able to fulfil the social expectations of my small-town, religious upbringing, I knew I could not escape the sensation of being second-rate. I remembered the women at International Women’s Day with their stroppy slogans and loose clothing, clothes that didn’t present them on a plate, clothes that identified them as having choices and control. The choice seemed clear: I burnt my bras, made myself a muslin dress and threw away my high-heeled shoes.

To my dismay, I learned that what I sought to express through my appearance was often understood by men in quite a different way. Far from enhancing my efforts towards independence, freedom and self-worth, this style of dress actually attracted more harassment from men, who seemed to read “independence” as “unprotected”. Why was I attracting unwanted sexual attention? Was I too pretty? I certainly wasn’t trying to be – I only wanted to be taken seriously and treated as an equal. This problem of dress and appearance was profound.

I experimented. Abandoning all dress that could ever be considered attractive, I wore dull, concealing, dark clothes, and piled on some kilos for added protection. Although my sense of self was strengthened, socially I diminished. Feeling more invisible than before, I became angry and depressed. My female identity had no expression and I was further marginalised socially.

I capitulated: my identity became feminine. This demanded anorexia, shaving, plucking and adoption of mainstream fashion. There was an increase in social power, but it was superficial and limited. It also exposed me to the competitive aspect of male predation, accompanied by a devastating compromise in personal identity. I felt at my most vulnerable expressing this feminine identity.

The dress and identity experiments left me feeling without power or protection. There is no female camouflage save fat and drab, although scowling works quite well! For a time this was my camouflage, but I disappeared from my self. My power was lost. How to be real? How to dress a self? Rebellion and opposition left me on the margins everywhere.

Dress solutions
Participation in society requires mediation of these dilemmas, solved for me only by time and age. It seems to me that the gender, identity and dress problem has changed, as definitions of gender expand and change, as men become more body-conscious and women become more delinquent. I realise that the problem cannot be resolved – it is part of contemporary life to wrestle with ambiguity, to be caught between tensions and to experience ambivalence and life through a filter of gender, age and class. Self-confidence and ownership of one’s own power are directly linked to gender, class and age, and is a matter of adjusting and of placing the self in the role of conscious manager of own appearance.

By following those feminists in the 1970s, I experienced a different set of choices, conflicts and consequences. By aligning myself with feminism, I retained a level of choice and freedom and created a cultural space for myself. My dress style is slightly unconventional and I have a definite taste for the unusual. My style is not fashion – it’ colourful, it’s more about creative expression than status and is often what is so nicely termed “retro” dress. But it’s better. I can handle the responses I get and I enjoy some respect due to the power higher education has given me. It is good being a woman in my fifth decade, here and now. I wear trousers, dresses and skirts, and heels. And I study dress in society because it helps me to understand human behaviour, culture and my place in it. For me, this is power.

My Blog

My Blog
My Blog

Welcome to this, my first blog. As a deeply interested observer of all things dress and fashion, several things attracted my attention this week including nudity, glamour, and stripes.

Naked

Last week we saw four naked men in one afternoon.

Late Friday afternoon somebody in our office shrieked and in a moment everybody in the office was at the window. A group of young men were spotted cavorting on the campus lawn, stark naked in the weak Dunedin sunshine. These nude male bodies frolicked in front of the gothic stone backdrop of Otago University clock tower, performing for a small camera crew. Their slim young bodies were pale against the green, no tanning lotion to be seen. Their gestures were at first protective, either modest or cold or both, but soon they dropped all attempts to cover themselves and they ran about exuberantly, their dark triangles of public hair clearly visible to our naked eyes. Some were amused, some were embarrassed, some were just grateful they were young.

Everybody wanted to explain it. Was it International Naked Day? Some of the office silverbacks thought they were making a film clip for a TV sports show, an explanation that seemed most likely. But it made me wonder. Nudists can join a club, but where is the fun if nobody minds? Surely the intoxicating pleasure of nudity comes through doing something bravely unconventional, something socially shocking yet really harmless, and the liberating acceptance of your own body which follows, born of the absolute necessity of carrying it off. Maybe this is Gok’s trick too.

Nudity in a public place is a state of undress, a display of the absence of clothes. We are naked in the shower, but nudity is the display of it. This we rarely do. The TV show based on the idea of looking good naked (thank you, Gok Wan) relies on this extreme, where it is all about confidence and making the most of what you’ve got, about accepting your own body as it is. Once you have done this there are only two reasons left to hide: respect for authority or consideration for the aesthetic sensibilities of others.

‘Looking good naked’ thankfully doesn’t have anything to do with the appearance of those bits which anyway remain hidden in these shows and let’s leave it that way, thank you. A little mystery is a great mercy, and anyway it is good to keep something up your sleeve, as it were.

Coinciding with World Loud Shirt Day, World Nudity Day on Friday seemed like the perfect opportunity for more displays, but I saw only one small bunch of nude boys. Some local student pubs were offering cheap (not free) drinks for anyone taking their kit off, but I had better things to do on Friday night. Nobody I spoke to saw even one naked girl.

Now why is that?

Glamour, not
Glamour meanwhile was sadly lacking in the glamour event of the Spring Social Season: the Qantas film and television awards last weekend. A bit like their planes perhaps, this show failed to fly. Unwatchable really. All I could manage was a quick flick across to see what they were wearing. Dreadful! They were either trying too hard to be someone else or they didn’t try at all.

Is New Zealand just culturally too far from the Red Carpet Queens of Emmy and Oscar to do glamour? With the notable exception of Robyn Malcomb, there was zero style and zero glamour. Worse, a certain heavy handedness was evident. I sensed not murder but Auckland stylists behind this disaster: what were they thinking? That grey petal dress! Antonia’s ghastly gangster baby doll look! Wake up, New Zealand celebs! Famousness and money are not enough, honey. Fashion leadership takes flair and imagination yes, but also skill and knowledge. I mean self knowledge, fashion knowledge, dress knowledge. Forget about looking good naked, these people can’t even look good dressed up.

Stripes
Meanwhile, the Sunday Star Times has overturned the world as we know it, yet I almost missed this vital news item, hidden as it was on the bottom of page 10. We were given the shocking suggestion that science is not only willing but able to take over the task of telling us what to wear.
How did we manage for so long without them? Why did we ever imagine dress to be an art, often ambiguous, always context dependent, and only ever partly in the eye of the beholder? Science brings Rationalism to fashion, freeing us poor deluded women from fashion tyranny and lies. (Why did nobody think of this before?)
A so-called perception expert in the UK (with the conveniently common name of Dr Peter Thompson) has exposed ‘the myth’ of slimming vertical stripes and fattening horizontal ones. He claims it works the other way round, that horizontal stripe scan actually slim you by 6%!
He goes on to describe women as slaves to ‘fashionistas who don’t know what they are talking about’. Talk about the kettle calling the pot black. Anybody here ever worn a wide stripe around their largest circumference and not felt like they looked kilos heavier? And felt and looked slimmer wearing that other dress with the long straight lines? Is this because we are just stupid? I say show me your experimental design, Dr Thompson, and I will show you where you totally messed up. I expect it was somewhere in your definition of perception. Or maybe your definition of fashion. Or women. Or fashionistas. Or all of the above.
Science has joined the ranks of missionary liberators of women from stupidity, a mission as absurd as it is familiar. Quick, give that man a needle and thread! What will he come up with? And let us see what he is wearing.